WWuthering AI
PricingGet started

Where is AI agent demand actually growing, and who is winning the field?

"ai agents" is flat. "open-source ai agents" went from 420 searches a month to 35,233, and "ai voice agents" costs $51.22 a click. IBM earns more from these terms than anyone — and it is 0.12% of its site.

ai agents · the United States · measured · published

Measured from

Google search demand — monthly search volume, cost-per-click, difficulty and 12 months of history

Google organic results — which domains rank across the measured terms, and where; estimated organic traffic per domain

Google Ads Transparency Center — who is buying ads against these terms; the ads themselves, with the dates they ran

Terms measured

278

Searches a month

534,900

Click value a month

$12,235,061

What this attention costs to buy, not revenue anybody earned.

Cost to reproduce

160¢

8 calls, listed at the foot of this page.

The finding

The phrase "ai agents" has stopped growing. Both clusters carrying it are flat at 0%, and they are half the demand measured here. Everything still moving is a question about what kind of agent: open-source agents went from a quarter averaging 420 searches a month to one averaging 35,233, voice agents from 2,067 to 18,333 at $51.22 a click, and coding agents up 385%. The field behind those searches ranks differently depending on which number you read. IBM earns the most traffic from AI agent terms of any domain measured, $33,335 a month — and that is 0.12% of what ibm.com earns overall. agent.ai earns $18,433 from the same terms, and that is a third of its entire site. One of those is a company with an agent product; the other is a conglomerate that happens to rank.

Total monthly demand for ai agents

761,070searches in Jul 2026

trailing quarter against the opening one +31%

228,000457,000685,000Aug 2025: 479,570 searchesMar 2026: 846,000 searchesJul 2026: 761,070 searches
Aug 2025 · 479,570peak 846,000 in Mar 2026 · low 336,270Jul 2026 · 761,070
Monthly searches, summed across every cluster carrying history — 100% of the measured volume. The vertical axis starts at zero, so the shape is the change.

What do the numbers show?

  • The category term has stopped growing: "ai agents" and "intelligent agents" draw 148,500 searches a month each and both moved 0% across the measured window.
  • The growth is entirely in what kind of agent: "open-source ai agents" went from a quarter averaging 420 searches a month to one averaging 35,233, and "ai voice agents" from 2,067 to 18,333.
  • Voice agents carry the most expensive demand measured here: "ai voice agents" costs $51.22 a click, against $14.28 for open-source agents and $27.58 for coding agents.
  • IBM earns more from AI agent search terms than any other domain measured, at $33,335 a month — and that is 0.12% of what ibm.com earns overall, while agent.ai's $18,433 from the same terms is a third of its entire site.
  • No single domain owns this demand: the widest-ranking site is YouTube on 50% of the largest terms at a median position of 10, and Reddit is second on 42% at a median position of 2.
  • Demand here is overwhelmingly people asking rather than people navigating: 96% of the measured volume carries informational or commercial intent, across 278 terms and 534,900 searches a month.

Where is the demand, and which way is it moving?

278 terms carry 534,900 searches a month in the United States. Each group below is a set of phrases sharing a modifier — the word that says what the searcher actually wanted — and each is placed by how its own demand has moved against what that demand costs to buy.

Where the demand is moving, and what it costs
$100k$1.0M-50%-15%0%+15%+100%+300%← demand fallingdemand rising →monthly click valuechange across the measured window"ai agents", "agents in ai": 0%, 148,500 searches a month, $3.5M of click value — cash cow"intelligent agents": 0%, 148,500 searches a month, $3.5M of click value — cash cow"open-source ai agents": +900%, 28,690 searches a month, $388k of click value — land grab"ai coding agents": +69%, 21,040 searches a month, $348k of click value — land grab"how to build an ai agent": +87%, 10,750 searches a month, $188k of click value — rising fringe"ai voice agents": +454%, 9,580 searches a month, $373k of click value — land grab"ai agent platform": +26%, 8,720 searches a month, $315k of click value — land grab"ai agent builder": +153%, 7,120 searches a month, $222k of click value — land grab"google ai agents": -17%, 5,010 searches a month, $34k of click value — dead end"ai agents", "agents in ai"0%"intelligent agents"0%"open-source ai agents"+900%"ai coding agents"+69%"how to build an ai agent"+87%"ai voice agents"+454%"ai agent platform"+26%"ai agent builder"+153%"google ai agents"-17%
Rising (≥ +15%)Flat, or not ratedFalling (≤ −15%)Bubble area is monthly searches.
Shaded bands are the thresholds the engine bands on: falling at or below −15%, rising at or above +15%, flat between them. The vertical axis is logarithmic; the horizontal one is square-root scaled either side of zero, so one cluster at several hundred percent cannot flatten the rest into a stripe — the ticks carry the true values.
Share of the demand, and which way it moved
  • "ai agents", "agents in ai"cash cow
    148,5000%
  • "intelligent agents"cash cow
    148,5000%
  • "open-source ai agents"land grab
    28,690+900%
  • "ai coding agents"land grab
    21,040+69%
  • "how to build an ai agent"rising fringe
    10,750+87%
  • "ai voice agents"land grab
    9,580+454%
  • "ai agent platform"land grab
    8,720+26%
  • "ai agent builder"land grab
    7,120+153%
  • "google ai agents"dead end
    5,010-17%
Rising (≥ +15%)Flat, or not ratedFalling (≤ −15%)Bar length is monthly searches; the line is that cluster's own 12 months.

How to read a position

cash cow
Flat and expensive. Whoever holds these terms holds them; entering costs more than it returns.
land grab
Demand is rising and advertisers are paying for it. Open now, and not for long.
rising fringe
Rising, and nobody is paying for it yet. Cheap to own, unproven as revenue.
dead end
Falling and cheap. Nothing here is worth building on.
Search demand clusters for ai agents, measured 2026-09-03
ClusterSearches/moClick value/moChangeDifficultyPosition
"ai agents", "agents in ai"ai agents148,500$3,529,8450%64cash cow
"intelligent agents"intelligent148,500$3,529,8450%58cash cow
"open-source ai agents"open28,690$387,673+900%29land grab
"ai coding agents"coding21,040$348,099+69%28land grab
"how to build an ai agent"how10,750$187,561+87%32rising fringe
"ai voice agents"voice9,580$372,689+454%32land grab
"ai agent platform"platform8,720$315,395+26%27land grab
"ai agent builder"builder7,120$221,933+153%38land grab
"google ai agents"google5,010$34,476-17%30dead end

The twenty largest phrases, and which way each one moved

Cluster averages say which kind of question is growing. These are the phrases themselves, each with its own direction, so a page written against this category can be aimed at a term rather than at a theme.

The twenty largest search terms measured for ai agents
Search termSearches/moCPCDifficultyChangeCluster
agents in ai49,500$23.77570%"ai agents", "agents in ai"
agents ai49,500$23.77670%"ai agents", "agents in ai"
ai agents49,500$23.77670%"ai agents", "agents in ai"
intelligent agents in ai49,500$23.77640%"intelligent agents"
intelligent agents ai49,500$23.77470%"intelligent agents"
ai intelligent agents49,500$23.77640%"intelligent agents"
open-source ai agents9,900$14.2840+8289%420 → 35,233/mo"open-source ai agents"
open source ai agents9,900$14.2819+8289%420 → 35,233/mo"open-source ai agents"
ai powered coding agents8,100$2.3737+17870%110 → 19,767/mo"ai coding agents"
ai coding agents6,600$27.5830+385%"ai coding agents"
ai voice agents6,600$51.2234+787%2,067 → 18,333/mo"ai voice agents"
open source ai coding agents4,400$8.4731+5929%230 → 13,867/mo"open-source ai agents"
how to build an ai agent2,900$19.7824+104%"how to build an ai agent"
no-code ai agents2,400$23.4715-95%"ai coding agents"
no code ai agents2,400$23.4715-95%"ai coding agents"
ai agents platforms2,400$39.2332+29%"ai agent platform"
ai agents platform2,400$39.2324+29%"ai agent platform"
ai agent platform2,400$39.2332+29%"ai agent platform"
ai agents builder2,400$31.8649+90%"ai agent builder"
ai agent builder2,400$31.8649+90%"ai agent builder"

A change above a few hundred percent is printed with the two windows behind it, because "a hundred searches became three thousand" and "+2,922%" are the same fact and only one of them can be mistaken for a category doubling.

Change is measured 12-month swing, trailing quarter against the opening quarter, on each cluster's own summed monthly series rather than as an average of its terms — one term going from a handful of searches to a few hundred would otherwise drag a flat cluster into "surging". A cluster marked not rated had too little history, or history covering too little of its volume, to place; that is reported rather than shown as flat.

cash cow

0%

"ai agents", "agents in ai": what are these 3 terms telling you?

The bare phrase and its two word orders draw 148,500 searches a month between them and did not move at all across the window. At a difficulty of 64 it is also expensive to enter. A page written for "ai agents" competes with everything already written for it, for demand that has stopped growing.

Largest terms in the "ai agents", "agents in ai" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
agents in ai49,500$23.7757informational
agents ai49,500$23.7767commercial
ai agents49,500$23.7767commercial

cash cow

0%

"intelligent agents": what are these 3 terms telling you?

"intelligent agents in ai" and its variants draw another 148,500 searches a month and are equally flat. Together with the bare phrase, the generic terms are more than half the demand measured here and none of it is moving — which is what makes the rest of this page interesting.

Largest terms in the "intelligent agents" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
intelligent agents in ai49,500$23.7764informational
intelligent agents ai49,500$23.7747informational
ai intelligent agents49,500$23.7764commercial

land grab

+900%

"open-source ai agents": what are these 9 terms telling you?

The fastest-moving cluster measured. "open-source ai agents" went from a quarter averaging 420 searches a month to one averaging 35,233, and "open source ai coding agents" from 230 to 13,867. At a difficulty of 19 for one of the two spellings and a $14.28 cost-per-click, this is demand that arrived faster than anyone has written for it.

Largest terms in the "open-source ai agents" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
open-source ai agents9,900$14.2840commercial
open source ai agents9,900$14.2819commercial
open source ai coding agents4,400$8.4731commercial
open ai agents builder1,600$17.2311commercial
open ai agent builder1,600$17.2321commercial
open ai agents sdk590$18.6872navigational
open source ai agent platform590not reported45commercial
ai agent open source70$13.1235commercial

land grab

+69%

"ai coding agents": what are these 9 terms telling you?

"ai coding agents" is up 385% at a $27.58 cost-per-click, and "ai powered coding agents" went from 110 searches a month to 19,767. The no-code variants moved the other way, down 95% — the audience asking about coding agents is developers, and it is growing while the no-code framing shrinks.

Largest terms in the "ai coding agents" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
ai powered coding agents8,100$2.3737commercial
ai coding agents6,600$27.5830commercial
no-code ai agents2,400$23.4715commercial
no code ai agents2,400$23.4715informational
ai agents for coding590$23.4330commercial
best ai coding agents390$20.308commercial
best ai agents for coding320$20.738commercial
coding ai agents170$23.8617commercial

rising fringe

+87%

"how to build an ai agent": what are these 11 terms telling you?

"how to build an ai agent" at 2,900 searches a month leads a cluster up 87%. Instructional demand rising while the category term is flat says the people arriving are practitioners, not evaluators — they have decided what an agent is and want to make one.

Largest terms in the "how to build an ai agent" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
how to build an ai agent2,900$19.7824informational
how to create an ai agent1,900$16.9922informational
how to build ai agents1,600$17.7241informational
how to create ai agents1,000$17.1833informational
how to make an ai agent720$19.1729informational
how does ai agents work590$13.0643informational
how do ai agents work590$13.0655informational
how to use ai agents480$16.7059informational

land grab

+454%

"ai voice agents": what are these 5 terms telling you?

The most expensive demand on this page. "ai voice agents" costs $51.22 a click, more than three times the head term, and went from 2,067 searches a month to 18,333. Nothing else measured here combines that price with that growth, which is what a market being bid for by people who can calculate a payback period looks like.

Largest terms in the "ai voice agents" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
ai voice agents6,600$51.2234commercial
conversational ai voice agents1,300not reported25commercial
voice ai agents880$36.6438commercial
lowe's ai voice agents480not reported6commercial
elevenlabs ai voice agents320$7.4837commercial

land grab

+26%

"ai agent platform": what are these 7 terms telling you?

"ai agents platform" and its variants draw 8,720 searches a month, up 26%, at a difficulty of 27. Platform framing grew more slowly than any specific kind of agent measured here, which is the same finding the head term gives: buyers have stopped shopping for the category and started shopping for a capability.

Largest terms in the "ai agent platform" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
ai agents platforms2,400$39.2332commercial
ai agents platform2,400$39.2324commercial
ai agent platform2,400$39.2332commercial
no code ai agent platform1,000$20.2815commercial
ai agent builder platform210$21.6222commercial
best ai agent platform170$23.916commercial
ai agent orchestration platform140$28.966commercial

land grab

+153%

"ai agent builder": what are these 5 terms telling you?

"ai agents builder" and "ai agent builder" draw 2,400 searches a month each at $31.86 a click, and the no-code builder variants are up 460% at a difficulty of 10. Buying intent at a low difficulty is the combination worth acting on, and it is here rather than on the category term.

Largest terms in the "ai agent builder" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
ai agents builder2,400$31.8649commercial
ai agent builder2,400$31.8649commercial
no code ai agents builder1,000$31.4816commercial
no code ai agent builder1,000$31.4810commercial
best ai agents builder320$18.8928commercial

dead end

-17%

"google ai agents": what are these 6 terms telling you?

The only cluster falling. "google ai agents" is down 5% and the cluster down 17%, dragged by a single vendor announcement term that lost effectively all of its volume. A branded pairing shrinking inside a category whose unbranded capability terms are growing is a share story, not a market one.

Largest terms in the "google ai agents" cluster
TermSearches/moCPCDifficultyIntent
google ai agents1,900$10.0046commercial
wells fargo google cloud ai agents1,000not reported2commercial
google gemini ai agents720$7.0937navigational
5-day ai agents intensive course with google590$6.2124commercial
google ai agents course480$6.4420informational
google cloud ai agents320$11.3038commercial

Who is capturing this demand today?

Across the 100 largest terms, this demand is contested. Coverage is the share of those terms a domain ranks for at all; median position is where it sits when it does.

Share of the 100 largest terms each domain ranks for
  • www.youtube.commedian position 10
    50%
  • www.reddit.commedian position 2
    42%
  • medium.commedian position 10
    33%
  • www.lindy.aimedian position 14
    21%
  • dev.tomedian position 40
    21%
  • www.ibm.commedian position 3
    20%
  • www.salesforce.commedian position 5
    20%
  • www.linkedin.commedian position 22
    20%
Coverage counts a domain that ranks anywhere on a term. Median position says where it sits when it does — a domain on most terms at position 30 is present, not winning.
Domains ranking across the largest terms for ai agents
DomainRanks onMedian positionEst. traffic value/mo
www.youtube.com50% of terms10$4,538
www.reddit.com42% of terms2$12,022
medium.com33% of terms10$1,170
www.lindy.ai21% of terms14$1,176
dev.to21% of terms40$216
www.ibm.com20% of terms3$33,335
www.salesforce.com20% of terms5$5,306
www.linkedin.com20% of terms22$434

What are the advertisers actually saying?

The ads below ran against this subject on the dates shown. Each image is the creative as it was served, captured from the public ad transparency record and stored here so the picture and the claim beside it stay the same age; the link goes to the record it came from.

Source: Google Ads Transparency Center, captured . Ad transparency shows ads that were served; it does not report spend, and an advertiser absent from it is not proven absent from the auction.

Who is actually winning the AI agent field?

Ranked on what each domain earns from these terms rather than on its size, the leaderboard is IBM, agent.ai, Google Cloud, Salesforce, Gumloop. The last column is the one that matters. For IBM this market is 0.12% of its site and for Salesforce 0.08%; for agent.ai it is 33%. The incumbents rank here because they rank everywhere; the startups rank here because this is what they do, and Gumloop does it from a median position of 2.

Who is actually winning the AI agent field?
DomainFrom these termsWhole domainShare
ibm.com$33,335$27,914,6790.12%
agent.ai$18,433$55,58633.16%
cloud.google.com$7,067$5,699,8630.12%
salesforce.com$5,306$6,855,3300.08%
gumloop.com$2,601$257,3011.01%
n8n.io$1,445$150,1170.96%
lindy.ai$1,176$148,5020.79%

Who is buying ads against "ai agents"?

Agencies and course sellers, not agent vendors. The domains found advertising are blitzaiagents.com, askaiagents.com, aiagents.dev, ezofisaiagents.com, theaiagentscourse.com and theaiagentsbootcamp.com — done-for-you automation services and training. Not one of the products ranking in the field above was found bidding on the category term. It is the same shape the vibe coding measurement found: when a category term is expensive and generic, the people who buy it are selling the explanation, not the software.

Who is buying ads against "ai agents"?
DomainWhat it sells
blitzaiagents.comDone-for-you AI agent automations
theaiagentscourse.comA course
theaiagentsbootcamp.comA bootcamp
askaiagents.comNot established by this run
aiagents.devNot established by this run

Is the AI agents market still growing?

The category term is not. "ai agents" and "intelligent agents" draw 148,500 searches a month each and both moved 0% across the measured window. What is growing is every question about a specific kind of agent: open-source agents went from 420 searches a month to 35,233, voice agents from 2,067 to 18,333, and coding agents are up 385%.

Which AI agent keywords are worth writing for?

The capability terms, not the category. "open-source ai agents" grew fastest and sits at a difficulty of 19 for one of its two spellings; the no-code builder terms are up 460% at a difficulty of 10. The head term is flat at a difficulty of 64, which is the most expensive position on this map and the least likely to move.

Which company is winning AI agent search?

It depends which number you read, and that is the finding. IBM earns the most from these terms at $33,335 a month, but that is 0.12% of its site — it ranks here because it ranks everywhere. agent.ai earns $18,433 from the same terms and that is 33% of its entire business. On share of their own traffic, the specialists are winning; on absolute traffic, the incumbents are.

What is the most expensive AI agent keyword?

"ai voice agents", at $51.22 a click — more than three times the head term and the highest price measured in this run. It is also up 787%, from a quarter averaging 2,067 searches a month to one averaging 18,333. Price and growth together usually mean buyers who can calculate a return.

How was this measured?

Seven calls to a public data API, listed at the bottom of this page with their arguments. Search volumes, cost-per-click, difficulty and monthly history come from Google search demand; the field and who ranks in it from Google organic results; the advertising picture and the ad images from the Google Ads Transparency Center. Anyone can run the same calls and get the same shape.

What does this case study not show?

  • This measures search demand in the United States, in English. AI agent adoption is global and this run does not describe it.
  • The advertiser list from ad transparency is matched partly on company name, which for a phrase like "ai agents" returns companies that are not in this market at all — an air travel insurer and a shipping agency appeared among the eight matched. Only the advertising domains are treated as evidence here, and the creatives shown were fetched from those.
  • The field was derived from the domains ranking across this subject's own largest terms, with platforms and publishers removed. A company that sells agents but does not rank for these phrases is absent from that list and is not proven absent from the market.
  • The whole-domain column measures the entire site, not a product line. IBM's figure is IBM, and the share column exists so that difference is visible rather than implied.
  • Cluster names are this engine's description of a group of phrases, not a taxonomy anybody else uses. The grouping is reproducible from the terms listed under each one.
  • Several terms here moved from a base small enough that their percentage is fragile; the two windows behind any change above 500% are printed beside it.
  • The Searches/mo column is the source's reported monthly figure, a rolling average, while momentum compares three-month means from the same series. For a term that moved sharply inside the window the two differ, which is why both are printed.
  • Click value is monthly searches multiplied by published cost-per-click. It prices the attention, and is not revenue anybody earned.
  • 2% of the measured volume carried no published cost-per-click and is excluded from every value figure, rather than counted as zero.

How do you reproduce every figure above?

Every number and every mark on this page came from one of the 8 calls below, and together they cost 160¢. Run them with your own token and you get this case study's raw inputs, measured today rather than on the date at the top of this page. That is the whole product: this page is one worked example of it.

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/keyword_suggestions?keyword=ai%20agents&language_code=en&limit=200&location_code=2840&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/keyword_ideas?keywords=ai%20agents&language_code=en&limit=200&location_code=2840&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/domain_serp_rivals?keywords=agents%20in%20ai%2Cagents%20ai%2Cintelligent%20agents%20in%20ai%2Cintelligent%20agents%20ai%2Cai%20intelligent%20agents%2Cai%20agents%2Cwhat%20is%20an%20ai%20agents%2Copen-source%20ai%20agents%2Copen%20source%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20powered%20coding%20agents%2Cai%20coding%20agents%2Cai%20voice%20agents%2Cautonomous%20ai%20agents%2Cwhat%20are%20ai%20agents%2Copen%20source%20ai%20coding%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20news%2Chow%20to%20build%20an%20ai%20agent%2Cai%20agents%20platforms%2Cno-code%20ai%20agents%2Cbuild%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20builder%2Cai%20agents%20icon%2Cbuilding%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20explanation%2Cwhat%20is%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20platform%2Cno%20code%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20explained%2Cai%20agent%20builder%2Cai%20agent%20platform%2Cmanus%20ai%20agents%2Cn8n%20ai%20agents%2Cgoogle%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20marketing%20agents%2Cclaude%20ai%20agents%2Cbest%20ai%20agents%2Chow%20to%20create%20an%20ai%20agent%2Cai%20agents%20for%20business%2Copen%20ai%20agents%20builder%2Cai%20agents%20for%20businesses%2Chow%20to%20build%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20examples%2Cai%20agents%20example%2Copen%20ai%20agent%20builder%2Clindy%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20sales%20agents%2Cconversational%20ai%20voice%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20vs%20agentic%20ai%2Cai%20agents%20frameworks%2Cai%20agents%20framework%2Cconversational%20ai%20agents%20for%20businesses%2Cai%20design%20agents%2Cwells%20fargo%20google%20cloud%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20travel%20agents%2Cno%20code%20ai%20agents%20builder%2Cfree%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20course%2Chow%20to%20create%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20courses%2Cai%20agents%20market%2Cai%20agents%20marketplace%2Cno%20code%20ai%20agent%20builder%2Cai%20agent%20frameworks%2Cno%20code%20ai%20agent%20platform%2Cai%20agents%20conference%2Ccreate%20ai%20agents%2Cagentic%20ai%20vs%20ai%20agents%2Centerprise%20ai%20agents%2Cself-hosted%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20integration%2Cvoice%20ai%20agents%2Ccreating%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20tool%2Cgoogle%20gemini%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20for%20customer%20service%2Cmoltbook%20ai%20agents%2Csalesforce%20ai%20agents%2Cpersonal%20ai%20agents%2Cprinciples%20of%20building%20ai%20agents%2Cpersonalized%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20tools%2Cai%20phone%20agents%2Cai%20customer%20service%20agents%2Cmicrosoft%20ai%20agents%2Cconversational%20ai%20agents%2Cagents%20architecture%20in%20ai%2Cai%20agents%20architecture%2Cservicenow%20ai%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20definition%2Cai%20agent%20tools%2Cai%20agent%20architecture%2Chow%20to%20make%20an%20ai%20agent%2Cbuild%20an%20ai%20agent%2Cai%20agent%20definition%2Cai%20real%20estate%20agents%2Cai%20agents%20development%2Cfinance%20ai%20agents%2Copen%20ai%20agents%20sdk%2Chow%20does%20ai%20agents%20work%2Ctypes%20of%20ai%20agents&language_code=en&limit=50&location_code=2840&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/domain_traffic?language_code=en&location_code=2840&targets=lindy.ai%2Cibm.com%2Csalesforce.com%2Cbotpress.com%2Cmindstudio.ai%2Ccloud.google.com%2Cmake.com%2Crelevanceai.com%2Cmoveworks.com%2Cn8n.io%2Cgumloop.com%2Clangchain.com%2Cdomo.com%2Cslashdot.org%2Cagent.ai%2Cvellum.ai&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/ads_advertisers?keyword=ai%20agents&limit=30&location_code=2840&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/ads_creatives?language_code=en&limit=20&location_code=2840&target=aiagents.dev&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/ads_creatives?language_code=en&limit=20&location_code=2840&target=askaiagents.com&token=YOUR_TOKEN'

#  — 20c
curl 'https://wutheringai.com/v1/ads_creatives?language_code=en&limit=20&location_code=2840&target=blitzaiagents.com&token=YOUR_TOKEN'
Get a token and run these This case study as markdownThe method behind it